Active Notes
- NCAS Videos on YouTube
- NCAS on MeetUp with Photos
- Drinking Skeptically with NCAS -- Second Wednesday Each Month
- Browse our calendar of NCAS coming events and other noteworthy activities
- NCAS Members subscribe to our members-only NCAS-SHARE email discussion
- Non-Members subscribe to our free publications and monthly event notices
- Check out GrassrootsSkeptics.org for Skeptics groups near you
The Art of Science: Scientific Methods vs Pseudoscience
Saturday, Nov 14, 1:30 pm Public & FREE
Marvin Zelkowitz, Professor Emeritus and Research Professor in the Computer Science Department at the University of Maryland
National Science Foundation, Room 110
4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington,VA (Map)
Everyone has been exposed to the scientific method in grade school: Develop an hypothesis; Develop an experiment to test that hypothesis; Collect relevant data; Evaluate the data; Modify the hypothesis to account for differences in the observed and predicted results; and Repeat the process to improve your theory.
However, is this the way science works in practice? Do working scientists follow this method? Using computer science as a sample domain, the answer is "Sometimes." Looking at science in general, the differences between good and bad science and what levels of validation various experimental methods produce is discussed. Understanding when scientists do science and when they are venturing into the realm of pseudoscience is the focus of this talk.
Marvin Zelkowitz is a Professor Emeritus and Research Professor in the Computer Science Department at the University of Maryland. He has been studying software development issues and technology transfer for the past 40 years. He is also on the Board of Directors of NCAS and is currently the Treasurer.
Item link
Marvin Zelkowitz, Professor Emeritus and Research Professor in the Computer Science Department at the University of Maryland
National Science Foundation, Room 110
4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington,VA (Map)
Everyone has been exposed to the scientific method in grade school: Develop an hypothesis; Develop an experiment to test that hypothesis; Collect relevant data; Evaluate the data; Modify the hypothesis to account for differences in the observed and predicted results; and Repeat the process to improve your theory.
However, is this the way science works in practice? Do working scientists follow this method? Using computer science as a sample domain, the answer is "Sometimes." Looking at science in general, the differences between good and bad science and what levels of validation various experimental methods produce is discussed. Understanding when scientists do science and when they are venturing into the realm of pseudoscience is the focus of this talk.
Marvin Zelkowitz is a Professor Emeritus and Research Professor in the Computer Science Department at the University of Maryland. He has been studying software development issues and technology transfer for the past 40 years. He is also on the Board of Directors of NCAS and is currently the Treasurer.
Item link
